Case law

E-mail from the Tribunal to the Parties regarding the Final Award in Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC v. Government of Canada

2018-54

Gericht
Permanent Court of Arbitration
Aktenzeichen
2018-54
Datum
20.04.2022
Dokumenttyp
final_award

From: Jose Luis Aragon Cardiel To: "Barry Appleton"; Cavinder.Bull@drewnapier.com; dbethlehem@twentyessex.com; dbishop@kslaw.com; Diana Pyrikova Cc: Mark.Klaver@international.gc.ca; Heather.Squires@international.gc.ca; Alexandra.Dosman@international.gc.ca; Stefan.Kuuskne@international.gc.ca; Krystal.Girvan@international.gc.ca; "Benjamin.Tait@international.gc.ca"; Eliza.VanWingerden@international.gc.ca; Tennant Claimant; Ed Mullins Subject: RE: Tennant Energy, LLC v. Canada - Response to Canada"s Renewed Application for Security for Costs Date: 20 April 2022 12:43:10 Dear Mesdames, dear Sirs,  I write on behalf of the Tribunal.  The Tribunal has carefully considered the Respondent’s application dated 16 February 2022 to admit the final award in Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. UNCT/20/3). The Tribunal has also carefully considered the Claimant’s response to that application dated 24 February 2022.  The Tribunal unanimously decides to grant the application and admit the final award in Westmoreland into the record. The Respondent is accordingly directed to submit the award into the record of the proceedings with an appropriate docket number. As the Tribunal previously indicated in its communication dated 10 November 2021, such awards are not binding and merely represent one tribunal’s reasoning on a particular set of facts. The Tribunal sees no reason why it should not consider such reasoning, and the Tribunal will decide after hearing submissions from both Parties whether the reasoning in Westmoreland is helpful or otherwise.  In addition, the Tribunal is not persuaded by the Claimant’s argument that “significant and burdensome” complications may arise from the Respondent’s request to add the additional authority, or that this may delay any decision on the jurisdictional phase for up to 6 months. The Tribunal sees no basis for requesting or allowing further Article 1128 submissions. The Tribunal likewise sees no basis to seek and permit the admission of any of the associated materials, e.g. the expert opinion of Jan Paulsson or evidence on US bankruptcy law. As stated above, the Tribunal is merely considering another tribunal’s reasoning on a particular set of facts, and will decide after hearing Parties whether such reasoning is helpful to the present facts or not.  In this regard, Parties are invited to address the Tribunal on the Westmoreland final award by Wednesday, 4 April 2022. Such submissions are to be limited to no more than 20 pages.  Noting that the award is already in the public domain, and with a view to assisting the Parties in focusing their submissions, in addition to addressing any general points that each Party considers may be relevant arising from the award, the Tribunal would find it helpful if the Parties would also address the following:   the principles set out at paragraph 195 of the Westmoreland award; whether “beneficial ownership at all relevant times with a NAFTA investor” (award, paragraph 195) includes beneficial ownership of a minority shareholding in a NAFTA Chapter 11 claimant; the relevance, if at all, to the present case of the Westmoreland tribunal’s assessment at paragraph 201 of its award (reflected also in paragraph 212 of the award); having regard to paragraph 220 of the Westmoreland award, the relevance (if at all) of the Westmoreland award to circumstances in which a NAFTA Chapter 11 claimant may be the legal successor to a minority shareholding that may qualify as an “investor“ for purposes of NAFTA Chapter 11.   As for the Respondent’s re-application for security for costs dated 16 February 2022, the Tribunal will address the application in its decision on the jurisdictional phase.  Yours sincerely,  José Luis Aragón Cardiel Legal Counsel   • Conseiller juridique Permanent Court of Arbitration • Cour permanente d'arbitrage

Peace Palace • Palais de la Paix Carnegieplein 2 2517 KJ The Hague • La Haye The Netherlands • Pays-Bas Tel: +31 70 302-4155 (direct • directe) Fax: +31 70 302-4167 URL: http://www.pca-cpa.org  *** This email and any attachments may be confidential. Please notify us immediately if you have received this email or any attachment in error. *** Ce courriel, ainsi que toute pièce jointe, peut être confidentiel. Si vous avez reçu ce message ou toute pièce jointe par erreur, veuillez nous en aviser immédiatement. ***